Cryptocurrency Investment Risk Analysis Using The Value At Risk (Var) Method

Authors

  • Galuh Boga Kuswara Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia
  • Mega Zhafarina Purwono Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia
  • Gema Merdeka Goeyardi Universitas Narotama Surabaya
  • Achmad Muchayan Universitas Narotama Surabaya
  • I Gede Arimbawa Universitas Narotama Surabaya

Keywords:

Value at Risk; Expected Shortfall; cryptocurrency; GARCH; backtesting; risk management

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies offer high potential returns but expose investors to extreme price fluctuations, making the measurement of downside risk essential. This study analyzes the investment risk of five major cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB, Solana, and XRP) and an equally weighted portfolio using the Value at Risk (VaR) method. Daily data from 2 January 2020 to 30 June 2026 are used to estimate one day VaR at the 95% and 99% confidence levels with five approaches: historical simulation, the variance covariance (normal) method, the Cornish Fisher modified VaR, Monte Carlo simulation with Student t innovations, and a GARCH(1,1) model with Student t errors. Expected Shortfall is computed as a complementary measure. The accuracy of each approach is evaluated through out of sample backtesting over 1,642 days using the Kupiec unconditional coverage test and the Christoffersen conditional coverage test. The results show that cryptocurrency returns are strongly non normal, with excess kurtosis for all assets. At the 99% level, the one day VaR ranges from 5.87% to 11.93% under historical simulation, implying a potential daily loss of up to Rp11.928.115 on an investment of Rp100 million in Solana. The normal VaR underestimates extreme losses and is rejected at the 99% level for 3 of six series, whereas the GARCH t model passes all backtests at both confidence levels. The portfolio reduces VaR by about 28% compared with the average individual asset. The findings recommend that crypto investors and platforms use fat tailed, volatility sensitive VaR models rather than the normal approach.

References

Acerbi, C., & Tasche, D. (2002). On the coherence of expected shortfall. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1487 to 1503.

Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203 to 228.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1996). Amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market risks. Bank for International Settlements.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2019). Minimum capital requirements for market risk. Bank for International Settlements.

Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177 to 189.

Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307 to 327.

Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 542 to 547.

Christoffersen, P. F. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 841 to 862.

Chu, J., Chan, S., Nadarajah, S., & Osterrieder, J. (2017). GARCH modelling of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 10(4), 17.

Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019). Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62, 182 to 199.

Cornish, E. A., & Fisher, R. A. (1938). Moments and cumulants in the specification of distributions. Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique, 5(4), 307 to 320.

Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987 to 1007.

Gkillas, K., & Katsiampa, P. (2018). An application of extreme value theory to cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters, 164, 109 to 111.

Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779 to 1801.

J.P. Morgan. (1996). RiskMetrics technical document (4th ed.). Morgan Guaranty Trust Company.

Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.

Katsiampa, P. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters, 158, 3 to 6.

Kupiec, P. H. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73 to 84.

Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2021). Risks and returns of cryptocurrency. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(6), 2689 to 2727.

Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. The Journal of Business, 36(4), 394 to 419.

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77 to 91.

Osterrieder, J., & Lorenz, J. (2017). A statistical risk assessment of Bitcoin and its extreme tail behavior. Annals of Financial Economics, 12(1), 1750003.

Pritsker, M. (2006). The hidden dangers of historical simulation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(2), 561 to 582.

Zangari, P. (1996). A VaR methodology for portfolios that include options. RiskMetrics Monitor, First Quarter, 4 to 12.

Downloads

Published

22-10-2026

How to Cite

Kuswara, G. B., Purwono, M. Z., Merdeka Goeyardi, G., Muchayan, A., & Arimbawa, I. G. (2026). Cryptocurrency Investment Risk Analysis Using The Value At Risk (Var) Method. Journal of Management, 5(2), 311–321. Retrieved from https://myjournal.or.id/index.php/JOM/article/view/687