Analysis Of The Contagion Effect Between The Cryptocurrency Market And The Indonesian Stock Market

Authors

  • Dewi Yolanda Putri Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia
  • Kania Laelawati Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia
  • Arasy Alimudin Universitas Narotama Surabaya
  • Ibnu Fajarudin Universitas Narotama Surabaya
  • Nila Sari Universitas Narotama Surabaya

Keywords:

contagion; cryptocurrency; Indonesian stock market; DCC GARCH; spillover index; financial crisis

Abstract

This study analyzes whether financial crises are transmitted between the cryptocurrency market and the Indonesian stock market through contagion, defined as a significant increase in cross market linkages after a shock, or merely through normal interdependence. Using daily returns of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), the Jakarta Composite Index (JCI), and the IDX technology sector index (IDXTECHNO) from 3 January 2018 to 30 June 2026, the study examines three crises: the COVID crash of 2020, which originated in traditional markets, and the Terra (LUNA) and FTX collapses of 2022, which originated in the crypto market. Three complementary methods are used: the adjusted correlation test of Forbes and Rigobon (2002), the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) GARCH model, and the spillover index of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012). The results show that during the COVID crash, the shock from the stock market spread to the crypto market, with significant contagion to Ethereum and weak contagion to Bitcoin even after correcting for heteroskedasticity. During the crypto crises, contagion did not reach the broad Indonesian market: correlations between crypto and the JCI declined. The technology sector, however, experienced significant contagion during the Terra (LUNA) collapse and a sharp rise in dynamic correlation during both crypto crises. The total spillover index averages 29.2%, with crypto assets acting as net transmitters and Indonesian stocks as net receivers, and it rises markedly after each crisis. The findings indicate that crypto shocks are transmitted selectively to the Indonesian technology sector rather than to the market as a whole.

References

Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177 to 189.

Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., & Ng, A. (2005). Market integration and contagion. The Journal of Business, 78(1), 39 to 69.

Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307 to 327.

Bouri, E., Molnár, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D., & Hagfors, L. I. (2017). On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Research Letters, 20, 192 to 198.

Conlon, T., & McGee, R. (2020). Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the COVID 19 bear market. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101607.

Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019). Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62, 182 to 199.

Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018). Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters, 165, 28 to 34.

Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 158 to 171.

Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57 to 66.

Dornbusch, R., Park, Y. C., & Claessens, S. (2000). Contagion: Understanding how it spreads. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 177 to 197.

Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339 to 350.

Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223 to 2261.

Iyer, T. (2022). Cryptic connections: Spillovers between crypto and equity markets (Global Financial Stability Notes No. 2022/01). International Monetary Fund.

Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 257 to 272.

Kaminsky, G. L., & Reinhart, C. M. (2000). On crises, contagion, and confusion. Journal of International Economics, 51(1), 145 to 168.

King, M. A., & Wadhwani, S. (1990). Transmission of volatility between stock markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 3(1), 5 to 33.

Kodres, L. E., & Pritsker, M. (2002). A rational expectations model of financial contagion. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 769 to 799.

Koop, G., Pesaran, M. H., & Potter, S. M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 119 to 147.

Kyle, A. S., & Xiong, W. (2001). Contagion as a wealth effect. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1401 to 1440.

Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2021). Risks and returns of cryptocurrency. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(6), 2689 to 2727.

Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17 to 29.

Downloads

Published

21-10-2026

How to Cite

Putri, D. Y., Laelawati, K., Alimudin, A., Fajarudin, I., & Sari, N. (2026). Analysis Of The Contagion Effect Between The Cryptocurrency Market And The Indonesian Stock Market. Journal of Management, 5(2), 276–287. Retrieved from https://myjournal.or.id/index.php/JOM/article/view/684