Digital Activism and Legitimacy of Law Enforcement (Case Study of "No Viral, No Justice" in the National Data Center Corruption Case)

Authors

  • Azkia Vera Maudy Universitas Wanita Internasional
  • Fitri Annisa Rachmah Universitas Wanita Internasional

Keywords:

“No Viral No Justice”, legal legitimacy, digital political participation, netnography, National Data Center.

Abstract

The “No Viral No Justice” phenomenon reflects a crisis of legal legitimacy in Indonesia, where law enforcement often only takes action after a case goes viral on social media. This study aims to analyze how the crisis of legal legitimacy, digital public pressure, uncoventional political participation, regulatory gaps, and media narratives shape the dynamics of law enforcement. The research method used was Netnography, collecting data from social media (Twitter/X, TikTok) and online news portals. Analysis was conducted though thematic coding of public posts , media acoounts, and public comments highlighting issues releted to the National Data Center. Reseacrh findings indicate that digital pressure from netizens acts as a primary catalyst, compelling legal institutions to respond swiftly to safeguard their public image. However, this pattern of virality driven law enforcement fosters selective case handling and widens the justice gap for those lacking digital acces. The study’s implications underscore the need for structural reform in law enforcement responsiveness to ensure it does not rely on online publik pressure. Advances in information technology have transformed the landscape of the relationship between the state and its critizens in Indonesia, the :No Viral No Justice” phenomenon has emerged as both a form of protest and an expression of public non-confidence in the performance of law enforcement agencies. When formal channels are perceived as slow and bureaucratic, social media transforms into a public courtroom a venue for enforcing justice that compels authorities to act more swiftly.

References

Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Macmillan.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

Huntington, S. P., & Nelson, J. M. (1976). No easy choice: Political participation in developing countries. Harvard University Press.

Gussela, M. D., Kurniawati, M., N, J. S., Hermanto, D., Fauziansah, S., & Saebani, B. A. (2024). Fenomena “No Viral No Justice” perspektif teori penegakkan hukum. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(2), 792–800. doi.org

Sinaga, I. V. S., & Hulwanullah, H. (2025). Dilema birokrasi penegakan hukum di era digital: Konflik due process of law dan tekanan opini publik dalam kebijakan Polri. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 10(4), 932–947. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik

Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption, and influence in transition. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444.

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Republik Indonesia. (2001). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.

Kompas.com — pemberitaan kasus Pusat Data Nasional pada 27 Juni 2024.

Metro TV — pemberitaan mengenai penanganan serangan terhadap Pusat Data Nasional pada 28 Juni 2024.

detik.com — pemberitaan terkait Pusat Data Nasional dan pernyataan pejabat pemerintah.

Citizenjournalist.id — sumber gambar kasus Pusat Data Nasional yang dicantumkan dalam Bab I.

Akun media sosial @secgron, @__AnakKolong, INFO SNBP & SNBT, dan MetroNewZ

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

Vera Maudy, A., & Annisa Rachmah, F. (2026). Digital Activism and Legitimacy of Law Enforcement (Case Study of "No Viral, No Justice" in the National Data Center Corruption Case). Journal of Law, Social Science and Humanities, 4(1), 562–573. Retrieved from https://myjournal.or.id/index.php/JLSSH/article/view/681