Analysis of Government Legitimacy Through Hoax Handling by the Department of Communication and Informatics of West Java Province

Authors

  • Muhammad Riyadh Abdillah Universitas Wanita Internasional
  • Desy Miranti Universitas Wanita Internasional

Keywords:

government legitimacy, rational-legal legitimacy, hoax handling, Jabar Saber Hoaks, Department of Communication and Informatics of West Java Province.

Abstract

The increasing spread of hoaxes in West Java shows that addressing disinformation remains a challenge in public information management. Although the Government of West Java Province, through the Department of Communication and Informatics, has established Jabar Saber Hoaks as an official channel for information clarification, its contribution to building public trust and strengthening government legitimacy still needs to be examined. This study analyzes government legitimacy through hoax handling using a rational-legal legitimacy perspective, which includes bureaucratic rationality, procedural legitimacy, public trust, and institutional transparency. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation involving nine informants consisting of the Head of the Department of Communication and Informatics of West Java Province, the Head of Public Information and Communication Division, two Jabar Saber Hoaks staff members, and five members of the public. The results show that the legitimacy of the Government of West Java Province through hoax handling has been established relatively well. This is reflected in systematic division of tasks and coordination, the implementation of fact-based verification procedures, public trust in the information provided by Jabar Saber Hoaks, and information transparency through various communication and reporting channels. The government's communication strategy also supports institutional transparency through the use of various digital platforms, simplified information presentation, and the provision of opportunities for public interaction. However, hoax handling still faces several challenges, including the rapid flow of information, developments in digital technology, the complexity of verification processes, limitations in field investigation, uneven publication reach, and varying levels of digital literacy among the public. The efforts undertaken include strengthening collaboration, improving human resource capacity, developing digital communication strategies, and promoting digital literacy. This study concludes that hoax handling is one form of government function that contributes to the formation and maintenance of the legitimacy of the Government of West Java Province in the digital environment

References

Book

Buckland, M. (2017). Information and society. MIT Press. Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.

Hendryadi, et al. (2019). Metode penelitian: Pedoman penelitian bisnis dan akademik. Jakarta: LPU-UNAS.

Heywood, A. (2019). Politics (5th ed.). London: Red Globe Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rodin, R. (2020). Informasi dalam konteks sosial budaya. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Siti, M. (2022). Dinamika politik teori kontemporer. CV Mitra Ilmu (In press). Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework. Council of Europe.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology.

Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Winarno, B. (2021). Komunikasi Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Governance.

Pustaka Pelajar. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Journal

Afifah, K. N., Hasbiyah, D., & Setiawan, K. (2023). Efforts to address COVID-19 hoax news on the Bogor Regency Communication and Informatics Agency (Diskominfo) website. Karimah Tauhid, 2(6), 2758–2766.

Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.

Alessandro, M., Lagomarsino, B. C., Scartascini, C., & Torrealday, J. (2020). Transparency and trust in government: Evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 133, 105223.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223

Bhakti, P. S., & Syarifuddin, D. (2025). Public policy legitimacy in the era of disinformation: A sociological study on public response to the free nutritious meal program in Indonesia. Collaborative Journal of Science, 8(12), 8435–8442.

Boon, J., et al. (2025). Citizens' legitimacy judgments on multi-stakeholder governance models: The spillover effects of corporate political activity and social trust. European Management Journal, 43(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.04.004

Budiana, M. B. (2025). Building government legitimacy: The role of public trust, transparency, and social media effectiveness in the dynamics of public perception. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence, 4(2), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v4i2.1460

Chen, Q., Min, C., Zhang, W., Wang, G., Ma, X., & Evans, R. (2023). The impact of government use of social media on trust in government and citizens' attitudes in times of crisis. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113748

Camico, D. B. (2024). Practical legitimacy in the sociopolitical sphere: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Social Humanities, 1(1), 18–37.

Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(1), 6–9.

Frivaldo, F. S. (2026). Transparency in Governance: The Influence of Open Data on Public Trust in the Philippine Context. F1000Research, 15, 495. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.178726.1

Gerschewski, J. (2018). Legitimacy in autocracies: Oxymoron or essential feature? Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002183

Gjerazi, B. (2025). From Openness to Accountability: Transparency in EU Institutional Communication. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 12(1), 128–128.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2020). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13191

Gundla, M. P. (2025). Enhancing Transparency in Governance: Technical Workflows for Public Understanding. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit25112803

Guzmán, S. G. (2018). Rational legal authority. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosr026.pub2

Isik, O. (2025). Qualitative research approaches and data collection methods: Understanding meaning and experience. Journal of Humanities and Educational Development, 7(6), 19–32.

Ismail, A. M. I., Muhammad, M., & Tasya, A. N. (2023). Policy analysis of handling hoax news in online media at the Barru Regency Communication, Information, Statistics and Encoding Service (Diskominfo-SP). Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 5419–5431.

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42.

Lanie, E. O. (2023). Strategies for handling the spread of hoax information on social media by the Communication and Informatics Agency of Poso Regency, Central Sulawesi Province (Undergraduate Thesis). Institute of Home Affairs Governance (IPDN).

Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

Mahmudah, Siti Muslichatul, and Endri, Engga Probi. “COMMUNICATION APPROACH to COMMUNITY through SOCIAL MEDIA-BASED GOVERNMENT.” Asian Journal of Applied Communication, vol. 14, no. s1, 13 Aug. 2025, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.47836/ajac.14.s1.01. Accessed 25 Oct. 2025.

Nainggolan, G. B., & Annisa, R. (2024). The role of public relations in managing the Instagram account @Jabarsaberhoaks and special events for the West Java Communication and Informatics Office (Diskominfo). ULIL ALBAB: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 3(9), 112–130.

Nurcahya, Y. (2025). Rational-legal authority and electoral legitimacy: Reassessing Max Weber’s theory of power through the 2024 election in Bandung. Jejak Digital: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 1(6), 4251–4258. https://doi.org/10.63822/vjxng929

Qoirunnisa, A., & Wahyuni, Y. S. (2025). Legitimacy of power from Max Weber’s perspective in contemporary government. Journal Transformation of Mandalika. https://doi.org/10.36312/jtm.v6i8.5706

Qomaruddin, Q., & Sa'diyah, H. (2024). A theoretical study on data analysis techniques in qualitative research: Perspectives of Spradley, Miles, and Huberman. Journal of Management, Accounting, and Administration, 1(2), 77–84.

Rizkiyani, S., & Mujab, S. (2024). Power and authority from the perspective of government systems. Konsensus: Journal of Defense Studies, Law, and Communication Science, 1(4), 82–93.

Roihanah, R., Setiawan, F., Setianto, E., & Istinganah, I. (2022). Legitimacy and communication ...education policy. Jurnal Education and Development, 10(3), 94–99.

Salsabilah, W., & Putri, R. Y. (2022). Power in the realm of political and organizational studies. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 2(1), 29–42.

Sánchez del Vas, R., & Tuñón Navarro, J. (2024). Disinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine war: Two sides of the same coin? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 851. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03355-0

Sarjito, A. (2024). Hoaxes, disinformation, and national resilience: Information technology threats in Indonesian digital society. Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 6(2), 175–186.

Sastrawan, A., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Building Public Trust Through Government Communication Strategies: A Case Study Of Tapera Policies In Indonesia. JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA, 9(2), 249-264. doi:https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v9i2.8098

Sastrawan, A. (2026). Government communication in addressing public criticism to maintain public policy legitimacy: A case study of fuel price adjustments. ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 5(4), 525–531.

Schnell, S., Kim, J., Munno, G., & Nabatchi, T. (2024). How citizens want to “see” the state: Exploring the relationship between transparency and public values. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13769

Shahreza, M. (2018). Political communication ethics. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/hmdra

Silalahi, R. R., & Sevilla, V. (2020). Reconstructing the meaning of hoaxes amidst the flow of digital information. Global Komunika, 1(1).

Solihin, O., & Situmeang, S. M. T. (2025). The spread of hoaxes on social media: A communication analysis and legal review of the ITE law. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 3687–3700.

Sumitro, & Yorman. (2024). Government legitimacy from the perspective of modern democracy: An analysis of public participation and political accountability. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 3(5), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i5.1578

Syaqurani, S., Mujab, S., & Cahyani, S. A. (2025). Indonesian government efforts to address hoax content and disinformation on the TikTok platform. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal (IPSSJ), 3(1), 110–118.

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

Undayah, V. I., Fitriyani, A. R., Mauidunnajah, H., & Putri, I. (2025). The role and public relations strategies of the Serang City Communication and Informatics Agency in building the image of a local government institution. Konsensus: Journal of Defense Studies, Law, and Communication Science, 2(1), 158–166.

Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2024). Transparency and trust in government: Evaluating the effectiveness of open data initiatives. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Reviews, 3(4), 51–56.

Xia, S., & Zhang, C. (2026). In transparent government we trust: Open government data, transparency perception, and public trust. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2026.2632703

Constitution

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Openness.

Website

APJII. (2024). 2024 Survey on Indonesian internet user penetration and behavior.

Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association.

Statistics Indonesia (BPS). (2023). Population of West Java Province. https://www.bps.go.id

Gapura Jabar. Hoaxes continue to permeate West Java's digital space; here are the West Java Provincial Government's measures. 13 Jan. 2026, www.jabarprov.go.id/berita/hoaks-masih-warnai-ruang-digital-jabar-ini-langkah-pemprov-jabar-22745.

Ministry of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). National hoax issue report. https://www.kominfo.go.id

Mafindo. (2024). Indonesian hoax data. https://turnbackhoax.id

Nugroho, Y. (2020). Digital literacy and hoax in Indonesia. Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG).

OECD. (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. https://www.oecd.org

(2021). Government at a glance 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en

(2023). Good Practice Principles for Public Communication Responses to Mis- and Disinformation. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 30.

Etc

Rahardjo, M. (2017, February 13). Case study research design (Empirical experience) [Lecture paper]. Research Methodology Course Materials, Graduate School, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang, Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06

How to Cite

Riyadh Abdillah, M., & Miranti, D. (2026). Analysis of Government Legitimacy Through Hoax Handling by the Department of Communication and Informatics of West Java Province. Journal of Law, Social Science and Humanities, 4(1), 539–551. Retrieved from https://myjournal.or.id/index.php/JLSSH/article/view/679