Managing Communication Boundaries: A Lecturer’s Approach to Privacy and Professionalism on Discord
Keywords:
Communication Privacy Management, Discord, Communication boundaries, Lecturer privacy, Generation Z, Interpretive case studyAbstract
Digital transformation in higher education has reshaped how lecturers and students communicate, shifting from classroom-based interactions to more fluid online spaces. Discord, originally used by gaming communities, now functions as an alternative academic environment that integrates coordination, discussion, and social interaction. This study aims to understand how a lecturer manages the boundary between professional and personal domains when interacting with students via Discord, and the reasons behind these practices. The study employs an interpretive paradigm with a single-case study design. Data were collected through participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation of digital conversations on the Discord server “KEWIRAUSAHAAN – A MOR.” The analysis was conducted using interpretive thematic procedures with Communication Privacy Management theory as the conceptual lens. Five main themes were identified. First, the structure and division of Discord channels create an organized system for academic communication. Second, professional–personal boundaries are managed through spatial, temporal, and interactional norms. Third, privacy is understood as control over access and the rhythm of communication. Fourth, adaptation to Generation Z characteristics shapes a more flexible communication style without loss of authority. Fifth, digital professionalism is reflected in consistent values of integrity and responsibility across interactional contexts. This study affirms that academic communication practices on Discord center on boundary maintenance. Boundaries function as a means for lecturers to organize relational dynamics, protect personal space, and sustain professionalism within an increasingly open digital ecosystem.
References
A. Buzzetto-Hollywood, N., Banks, T., & J. Hill, A. (2024). Informing Academia Through Understanding of the Technology Use, Information Gathering Behaviors, and Social Concerns of Gen Z. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 27, 012. https://doi.org/10.28945/5388
Adamoli Matteo, Piccioni Tiziana, & Masiero Jacopo. (2023). Platformization of Third Digital Spaces During the COVID-19 Emergency: A Research in Higher Education in Italy. US-China Education Review A, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2023.05.001
AlGhamdi, R. (2025). Bridging learning gaps through Discord: peer-to-peer learning in computer graphics education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 19(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/LTHE-12-2024-0001
Annese, S., Amenduni, F., Candido, V., McLay, K. F., & Ligorio, M. B. (2022). Tutor’s Role in WhatsApp Learning Groups: A Quali-Quantitative Methodological Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.799456
Binabise, N. J. P., Cariaga, J. A. S., Peralta, E. A., Palabay, R. J. O., & Ancheta, O. J. (2024). My ideal teacher: the Gen Z’s choice. Diversitas Journal, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i4.3101
Čekrlija, S. (2024, December 10). Challenges of Teaching Methods for Generation Z at Universities, Case Study China. „Sustainable Development: Modern Trends and Challenges“. https://doi.org/10.52244/c.2024.11.16
Chuah, K.-M., Mohamad Deli, R., & Ch’ng, L.-C. (2025). Gen Z and Group Work: How Communication Styles Affect Free-Riding Behaviours. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 41(1), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2025-4101-24
Craig, C., & Kay, R. (2023). Examining the Discord Application in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Digital Life and Learning, 2(2), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.51357/jdll.v2i2.205
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
Faustyna. (2024). The Impact of Digital Communication Technology on Education in the Post-Crisis Period of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Communication in Scientific Inquiry (JCSI), 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.58915/jcsi.v5i1.1087
Ghazali, N. E. (2023). Engaging Learners using Discord Application During Signals and Systems Online Class. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 33(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.2.244253
Hosek, A. M., & Thompson, J. (2009). Communication Privacy Management and College Instruction: Exploring the Rules and Boundaries that Frame Instructor Private Disclosures. Communication Education, 58(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520902777585
Koolsriroj, U., Diteeyont, W., & Sutthinarakorn, W. (2022). Transforming Learning Activities at the Faculty of Education during the COVID-19 Situation. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.56278/asten.vi.1776
Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2021). Theories of human communication. Waveland Press, Inc.
Merunková, L., & Šlerka, J. (2019). Goffman’s Theory as a Framework for Analysis of Self Presentation on Online Social Networks. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13(2), 243–276. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-2-5
Metts, S., & Cupach, W. R. (2008). Face Theory: Goffman’s Dramatistic Approach to Interpersonal Interaction. In Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 203–214). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529.n15
Mikušková, E. B. (2023). Generational Differences in Teachers’ Professional Competencies. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-12-2023(volume-12-issue-4-october-2023), 1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1657
Munibi, A. Z., Boeriswati, E., Anoegrajekti, N., & Rahmat, A. (2024). EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF DISCORD-BASED BLENDED LEARNING ON ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILLS AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT. JURNAL EDUSCIENCE, 11(3), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v11i3.6434
Naghdipour, B., & Manca, S. (2023). Teaching presence in students’ WhatsApp groups: Affordances for language learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107968
Nasri, N., Mohd Rahimi, N., Hashim, H., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2023). Conceptualization of e-professionalism among physics student teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(3), 1346. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.25641
Ghazali, N. E. (2023). Engaging Learners using Discord Application During Signals and Systems Online Class. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 33(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.2.244253
Petronio, S., & Durham, W. T. (2014). Communication Privacy Management Theory. In Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication (pp. 314–327). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195511-28
Petronio, S., Ellemers, N., Giles, H., & Gallois, C. (1998). (Mis)communicating Across Boundaries. Communication Research, 25(6), 571–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006001
Pistón, M. (2023). How has the pandemic accelerated the transformation of Analytical Chemistry education from Generation Z to Alpha? Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 10(41), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.point-of-view-mpiston.N41
Sakti, R. H., Jalinus, N., Sukardi, S., Hidayat, H., Wulansari, R. E., Tin, C. T., & Ayasrah, F. T. M. (2024). Diving into the Future: Unravelling the Impact of Flowgorithm and Discord Fusion on Algorithm and Programming Courses and Fostering Computational Thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.18
Salehudin, M., Zurqoni, Z., Robingatin, R., Syobah, Sy. N., Janah, F., Rorimpandey, W. H. F., & Subakti, H. (2023). Mobile Learning With Discord Application as Creative Teaching. TEM Journal, 1697–1705. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM123-51
Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., Fryer, L. K., King, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2025). An Assessment of Learning Management System Use in Higher Education: Perspectives from a Comprehensive Sample of Teachers and Students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(2), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09734-5
Thorne, S. E. (2017). Interpretive description : qualitative research for applied practice. Routledge.
Thuy Thi Nguyen, Tuyet Thi Duong, Trang Huyen Thi Hoang, Ha Van Thi Nguyen, & Ha Thu Thi Mai. (2025). Research on factors affecting the living and learning habits of gen Z generation: The case of students of the school of economics, Hanoi university of industry. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 26(2), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.26.2.1718
Wiles, A. M., & Simmons, S. L. (2022). Establishment of an Engaged and Active Learning Community in the Biology Classroom and Lab with Discord. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00334-21
Wulan, R., Sunarto, S., & Kholil, K. (2025). Transformation of digital communication: Students’ timely graduation model in blended learning post COVID-19 pandemic. Decision Science Letters, 14(2), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2024.12.005
Wulansari, R. E. (2025). Empowering Minds in Discord-Integrated Case-Driven Flipped Classroom Model for Advancing Computational Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(4), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.4.2275
Yeung, M. Y., Cheng, H. H., Chan, P. T., & Kwok, D. W. (2023). Communication Technology and Teacher–Student Relationship in the Tertiary ESL Classroom During the Pandemic: A Case Study. SN Computer Science, 4(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01667-7
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications : design and methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shinta Qayla Vashty, Dedeh Fardiah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

